My Issues with The Fifth Element
May. 3rd, 2006 08:10 amMy crabby take on the 1997 Luc Besson Sf-Fi movie The Fifth Element behind cut:
G0atface lent me one of her favorite sewing movies, The Fifth Element. I can understand the appeal, now that I've seen it. The art direction/costumes are lavish and yet silly and campy. The plot is sort of adventure-farce, with some entertainly snide Bruce Willis dialog. Obvious pokes at pop culture, yada yada. I can see the appeal.
Maybe it's because I am of a certain age, but I could not, personally, get past the widely sexist vision of this (admittedly farcical) universe. Besson reportedly came up with this movie when he was 16, and boy it shows. There are no female in any sort of normal job or in any position of real responsibility. The only women that exist for Besson are young and beutiful. The one women Besson shows who is older and "unattractive" is held up for ridicule. Besson's "perfect" human is a woman, but according to the movie she is perfect because she is beautiful. She's also supposed to be powerful, but spends much of the movie undressing and waiting for Willis to rescue her. And Willis falls immediately in love with her for no other discernable reason because she is "perfect".
Oh, and the two depictions of Asian were pretty darn racist. As near as I could tell, the only Asians in the movie was a group of stereotypical Japanese school girls and a food vender with an accent that could have come out of a Charlie Chan movie. I haven't seen anything approaching this protrayal since Micky Rooney played a buck-toothed "Japanese" man in Breakfast at Tiffeny's. Do you have to be French to get away with this stuff?
If this movie had been made in the 1960s I could more easily laugh this off. But 1997? Come on folks, we were supposed to have gotten over this women-are-not-regular-humanbeings crap.
Like I said up front, maybe I'm just more sensitive to these things. I grew up in a time when women were still fighting discrimination. I remember being told--by my Girl Scout leader, of all people--that women were unable to have careers because they were too "emotional".
So, yeah. It's a button.
G0atface lent me one of her favorite sewing movies, The Fifth Element. I can understand the appeal, now that I've seen it. The art direction/costumes are lavish and yet silly and campy. The plot is sort of adventure-farce, with some entertainly snide Bruce Willis dialog. Obvious pokes at pop culture, yada yada. I can see the appeal.
Maybe it's because I am of a certain age, but I could not, personally, get past the widely sexist vision of this (admittedly farcical) universe. Besson reportedly came up with this movie when he was 16, and boy it shows. There are no female in any sort of normal job or in any position of real responsibility. The only women that exist for Besson are young and beutiful. The one women Besson shows who is older and "unattractive" is held up for ridicule. Besson's "perfect" human is a woman, but according to the movie she is perfect because she is beautiful. She's also supposed to be powerful, but spends much of the movie undressing and waiting for Willis to rescue her. And Willis falls immediately in love with her for no other discernable reason because she is "perfect".
Oh, and the two depictions of Asian were pretty darn racist. As near as I could tell, the only Asians in the movie was a group of stereotypical Japanese school girls and a food vender with an accent that could have come out of a Charlie Chan movie. I haven't seen anything approaching this protrayal since Micky Rooney played a buck-toothed "Japanese" man in Breakfast at Tiffeny's. Do you have to be French to get away with this stuff?
If this movie had been made in the 1960s I could more easily laugh this off. But 1997? Come on folks, we were supposed to have gotten over this women-are-not-regular-humanbeings crap.
Like I said up front, maybe I'm just more sensitive to these things. I grew up in a time when women were still fighting discrimination. I remember being told--by my Girl Scout leader, of all people--that women were unable to have careers because they were too "emotional".
So, yeah. It's a button.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-03 03:42 pm (UTC)(=BlowingShitUp *g*)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-03 04:23 pm (UTC)if she's so all friggin' powerful that tawoooooooow wuuuuuuuuuv wouldnt be required to save the friggin' planet.
you'd think the all knowing aliens would have figured that part out.
so I've been known to watch it and then skip the last bit ;)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-03 04:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-03 04:52 pm (UTC)I am also finding that "classic" movies are including stuff done in the last 20 years that I never thought would be considered "classic". The scripts these days are just getting more juvenile, but then our expectations are much more laden with thematic expectations than ever before. Story-telling is lost in the rush to include every race, religion, gender, age group and special effect in a positive way that gets us to theatres...to make someone money. This basic artistic element has been lost by many of the titles making it to the screen.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-03 06:06 pm (UTC)I dislike the movie too, but for reasons more akin to
no subject
Date: 2006-05-03 08:08 pm (UTC)Maybe it helps that when I was growing up, I was told repeatedly by my parents that women/girls could do anything, & this was reinforced by my mom marching down to do battle with the Hunmmmm...I need to think about that more, & maybe re-internalize parts of it.... :)