callistotoni (
callistotoni) wrote2006-07-31 12:11 am
Realm of Venus Plug
I have to say, I love the portraits available on this site. What I like even more is that she updates her stuff -- there's stuff here I've never seen before. :-) And her Portrait of the Month is cool, as well (not the showcase, but period portraits.)
http://realmofvenus.renaissancewoman.net
OK, so I'm fixated on costuming right now. What can I say, the muse is with me. ;-)
http://realmofvenus.renaissancewoman.net
OK, so I'm fixated on costuming right now. What can I say, the muse is with me. ;-)

no subject
(Of course... that has nothing to do with the fact that I got to be one of the showcases. That was just a cool bonus!)
no subject
no subject
Beautiful Ladies...
My issue... I would opine that most men's portraits only hint at the gentleman's clothing while most lady's portraits capture garb to a much greater degree. Is this because in period, men's styles are very much like current styles... i.e. all men wear the same thing (e.g. suits, jackets, shirts and sweaters) and only the fabric, cut and accessories (ties and shoes modernly) change?
Re: Beautiful Ladies...
Of course, female beauty was much more marketable for painters, so we have more unknown or "lessor" women models. It would seem that rich men are painted for thier honor and image, and so we see less "fashion".
Re: Beautiful Ladies...
This cioppa was the subject of a prior post to my journal... i.e. the black velveteen exterior and the gold/black jacquard lining the sleeves. It is an exceptionally splendid outfit, but I am toning down the fabric selections to fit my own tastes. I am also avoiding the elaborate leggings for a number of reasons. (By the way, the silk jacquard from Renaissance Fabrics is gorgeous.)
Considering my love of costuming/garb... I really need to learn how to sew!!! I know, I know... I will learn to sew in my voluminous spare time.